PCD Awards - PCD Solutions Category

SUBMISSION FORM

PCD Solutions are intrinsic or embedded and exclusively focused on the business or organizational performance outcome in measurable ways.  For example, a PCD Outcome that replaces the interface of an enterprise application such that (a) the frequency of data entry errors is reduced; (b) the frequency of incomplete information entered into the system is reduced; (c) the speed with which data is entered is substantially increased; and (d) the need for any form of learning in advance of doing is substantially reduced or, preferably, eliminated is performance-centered.  


Entry Title

Fresh Electronic Inspection Reporting/Resource System (FEIRS)

 

Submitted by:

SRA International

Contact Name:

Jay F. Graser

Phone:

(703)706-4371

E-mail:

jay_graser@sra.com

Address:

2051 Jamieson Ave., Suite 200

Alexandria, VA 22314

Logo:

 


Purpose:

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Fresh Products Branch (FPB) is responsible for the inspection of fresh fruits and vegetables.  FPB develops U.S. grade standards and provides grading, inspection and certification services (including good agricultural and handling practices) at shipping and destination locations throughout the country. These services facilitate the marketing of fresh fruits and vegetables.  Inspections are provided to the fruit and vegetable industry on a user fee basis.  These inspections are performed throughout the country and the service is centrally managed in Washington, DC.  Today, the Fresh Electronic Inspection Reporting/Resource System (FEIRS) is used by over 150 inspectors across the country; this inspection service is critical to FPB’s mission.  

 

The SRA team won an open competition contract to develop and deploy an application that converted the process from totally manual and paper-based to an automated inspection process.  To create the automated process, the SRA development team created an Electronic Performance Support System for including smart-fields, automatically populated forms, applying business process re-engineering where warranted, and enforcing inspection/grading business rules within the new automated process.  The contract scope of work required SRA to construct accountability into the system by associating the inspector’s time and attendance, expenses, and inspection fees with the final inspection certificate for National Finance Center (NFC) billing.  Additionally, the FEIRS application moved all reference material from cumbersome paper handbooks to online references and visual aides as well as  instant updates for inspection alerts and bulletins.

 

Today, SRA continues to provide annual maintenance for the FEIRS application that helps FPB manage and continue updating the inspection/grading program.  SRA provides new technical updates, consulting services to FPB within the USDA IT infrastructure, technical expertise to improve overall accuracy, and uniformity and efficiency of the Fresh Electronic Inspection Resource/Reporting System (FEIRS).  SRA provides system stability, develops new error correction algorithms, and provides the standardization required as new inspection materials and calculations are developed/modified within USDA.

 

 


Solution: 

(Required)

 

The FEIRS EPSS has helped FPB modernize the inspection/grading system for fresh fruits and vegetables by providing:

·         Streamlined data collection process

·         Improved accuracy

·         Job performance tools

·         Improved data sharing

·         Protected data integrity

·         Conformance to inspection standards

 

Project Challenges

·         Implementing a complete turnkey automated system where previously there was no significant technology in use

·         Capturing and replicating the entire grading system business processes

·         Simplifying the software interface to be usable by computer novices

·         Fast and effective system to handle the complex business rules of the grading process

·         Creating a portable system that could run standalone and connected online to the USDA network

·         Implementing a deployment/training plan that facilitates the adoption of technology-based solution to an aging workforce that is accustomed to a manual process

 

Benefits to Client

·         Automate a manual process and create a paperless system

·         Create accountability in the system tying expenses, time sheets, and fees to the inspection certificate

·         Real-time error checking of all inspections, inspections are more accurate with less need for correction

·         Inspections done faster, thus increasing revenue

·         Removal of archival paper handling and costly overnight shipping

·         Immediate issuance of inspection certificates

·         Instant access to all completed inspections via online web site

·         Provide online access to all inspection references material, commodities updates, and inspection bulletins

 

FEIRS provides these advantages to the USDA:

 

·         Data entry at the point of data capture:  out of the office, in remote areas, in packing houses, in shipping and marketing stations, and in other places where inspections are taking place, data is entered immediately, directly into the system, without having to rely on written notes after the inspection has been completed and the inspector returns to the office.

 

·         Data validation at the point of data entry:  data validation against all applicable business rules occurs as soon as the inspector enters the data, such functions as defect computations are automatically calculated.  This lets the inspector know immediately if more information is required to complete an inspection or if there are inconsistencies within the data, thus reducing inspection errors and the likelihood that follow-up visits will be required to obtain additional information.

 

·         Access to multiple systems through a single “portal” application:  integration of electronic reference materials, database applications, and office productivity software is united within a single, common “front end.”  This increases inspector efficiency by providing access to a wide variety of tools from one client.

 

·         Three mechanisms to issue inspection certificates – 1) printing a hardcopy using a portable printer at the inspection location, 2) faxing or 3) emailing an electronic copy.  Each certificate has a unique ID number.  Only the issued certificate is marked as the original copy, and additional copies are marked as non-original.  Once the certificate is completed, only authorized personnel, such as field supervisor and headquarters managers, are able to supersede it if needed.  The system also provides a list of all completed inspection certificates that have not been transferred as a reminder to the inspector. 

 

·         Digital image inspection function, which sends inspection certificate and related digital images to applicant via email over the Internet. 

 

 

 

Provide a detailed description of the overall design and/or specific components. Explain how the solution supports business (organization) and user performance. For example, does it reduce the amount of business knowledge performers require before they can perform the function and, if so, how does it do this? Include supporting graphics, screen shots, animation, or the like here so that we can see the supporting material.  Please provide access to the solution via the web or on CD/DVD.  If access is restricted, please provide six (6) user IDs and passwords. You may assume that the judges will be using IE6.x or above to view your entry. Be sure to note any plug-ins required and the details for obtaining them if not automatically provided. Your Solution information - including the samples provided - should focus on PCD attributes, including (but not necessarily restricted to):

  • Supports performers through best practice processes.
  • Establishes, or aids in establishing, goals.
  • Minimizes terminology translation or interpretation.
  • Provides access to supporting knowledge resources.
  • Focuses on task(s), processes, and the natural flow of work.
  • Reduces or eliminates the need for training/learning.
  • Supports performance FIRST, and learning only as a secondary consequence of doing.
  • Is innovative with respect to supporting performance.

 

 


Classification and state of deployment: 

(Required)

 

How would you classify your PCD Solution?  Check one:

Traditional EPSS - external or extrinsic "EPSS" solutions with designs rooted primarily in learning or reference

Performance-centered workflow solution - any PCD solution with a focus on directly supporting business processes (aka workflow)

PCD makeover - solutions that replace existing user interfaces with ones that exhibit attribute and behaviors of performance-centered systems

Embedded/ intrinsic PCD solution - performer-centered solutions that are strictly embedded in the task context and focus on task completion - not learning - without breaking the task context or flow

PCD featuring innovative technology - any performance-centered solution that features technology other than just a user interface to enable or enhance performance

Other category (describe): 

This entry is (check one):    In production (being used today in a live work setting)         In a formative stage (prototype, proof-of-concept, introduced a sample of its intended users)                   

 

 

 

 


Further details: 

(Required)

Use this section to provide further details and specifics of how the solution reflects certain PCD attributes.   Elaborate on one or more of the attributes if there is clear evidence to support claims (studies, measurements, well-documented anecdotes, etc.).  SHOW SCREEN SHOTS, ANIMATION (e.g., FLASH movie, animated gif or dynamic HTML) OR PROVIDE LINKS TO SUCH SAMPLES THAT SUPPORT YOUR RESPONSES.

 

NOTE:  The FEIRS application, installation instructions, basic manual and demonstration animation were sent to EPSSCentral on 18 August 2006, via FedEx.

 

The illustration below depicts the general features of FEIRS.

 

 

1. Supports performers through best practice processes. 

 

The analysis, design and development of FEIRS started with the assumption that the business process was stable and standardized.   In parallel with a spiral method of analysis, design and development, the team took on a business process re-engineering to ensure that the optimal process was captured and delivered through the FEIRS EPSS.  The USDA/SRA team used the alpha version of FEIRS to analyze the steps of the business process and develop business rules and algorithms that would best support the inspection process.  This also allowed the team to identify any areas of instability or lack standardization and either update the process or compensate using the features of FEIRS. 

 

The result was that senior inspectors and USDA Inspector School Instructors agreed upon the optimal process and business rules to guide the inspector through the grading of over 91 commodities, applying 158 grade standards. However, the resulting process took advantage of FEIRS capability to automate many of the sub steps and calculations that otherwise might have driven the USDA to completely rewrite and simplify hundreds of pages of standards and procedures.  These agreed upon best practices were captured as business rules and algorithms in the FEIRS EPSS. 

 

Synthesizes best practice behavior from multiple outstanding performers and incorporates best business practices or desired business practices that are not currently in place (as identified by business management).  Automates when possible and appropriate.  Stimulates performers through language, sequencing and other cues that prompt or enable what to do when (based on stored data, information, and performer input).  Creates deliverables using best practice form, content, language and style. 

 

2. Establishes, or aids in establishing, goals.

 

FEIRS minimizes the variation in inspection results and the time required to perform an inspection.  FEIRS reduces the average inspection time by at least 20%.  In the previous process, inspection invoices would take several days to get to the customer.  With the Fresh Products Branch being a fee for service office, it is reliant on generating revenue.  FEIRS allows them to rapidly provide inspection results in the form of a certificate and an invoice to speed revenue flow to FPB.

 

The time keeping function of FEIRS allows managers to readily compare inspections performed with time and travel expenses to determine more cost effective scheduling methods.  Real time collection and analysis of data allows them to identify undesired trends and take corrective action before any significant impact.

 

Includes explicit functions, elements, or components for the performer to select appropriate goals, presents relevant goals to the performer based on stored data/information or based on how performers have selected from among goals appropriate to the context, or re-directs performers toward only the most appropriate goals for the context.  Describes goal outcomes and delineates conditions, considerations, and/or criteria for selecting a goal.

Helps performers establish what they can do, want to do, or where to go, based on stored data/information.

 

3. Minimizes terminology translation or interpretation.

 

FEIRS includes drop down menus, context sensitive references and business rules that guide and normalize data entry.  For example, judging the color and condition of fruits and vegetables can be extremely subjective.  The FEIRS application includes detailed photographs that are presented at key points in the process.  The application also requires the user to calibrate their computer monitor to ensure each inspector is seeing exactly the same color.

 

Subjectivity is held to an absolute minimum by providing visual examples of the commodities.  This allows the customer to view the color calibrated photos and see for themselves examples of quality and condition standards.

 

The system minimizes cognitive burden by automatically displaying the correct measurement types, increments and tolerances for the commodity selected.  Inspectors and customers readily understand the requirements of the grade standards as they step through the process.  Any data that is entered in the wrong format or outside allowable tolerances causes the system to alert the inspector to correct the error before continuing.

 

Uses commonly understood terminology and descriptors rather than technically correct but obscure language that requires deep understanding of the domain or an unreasonable memory burden.  If the performer interacts with others (customers, suppliers, work groups), the system facilitates use of language familiar to all, and which does not require them to interpret unfamiliar jargon.

Minimizes cognitive burden associated with interpreting terms of the content domain or software interface.

Calls a duck a duck.

 

4. Provides access to supporting and learning resources.

 

Previous to the fielding of FEIRS, inspectors had to rely on a large volume of references to support the inspection process.  Each commodity possesses unique qualities and measures the inspector must evaluate in order to judge the quality and condition of the commodity.  Tolerances for each commodity can be very complex, yet an error by an inspector can mean that thousands of dollars of produce lose their value or consumers end up paying for sub standard produce.

 

The FEIRS system virtually eliminates the possibility for human error by providing just in time guidance through business rules and warnings that indicate to an inspector when they are entering data in error or operating outside the tolerances for the selected commodity.

 

More detailed references are available through the system in a context sensitive manner, guiding the inspector to relevant sections of the reference material.

 

Integrates and makes visible support resources to further explain, illustrate or provide examples/non-examples about information, goals, outcomes, data, terminology, graphics, etc. that appear on the primary display.  Support resources might include things like explanations, tips, examples, counterexamples, demonstrations, advice, walk-throughs (e.g. step-by-step explanation graphs, illustrations, procedures, processes, etc.), procedural steps, process diagrams, intelligent agents, system messages (aka error messages, dialogues), and exposing underlying logic.

These resources may be layered to accommodate performer diversity and/or to support the natural flow of work (i.e., resources are in support of criterion #5).

Support resources are represented in their most powerful form to achieve understanding, learning or task performance (e.g. a voice-narrated demonstration is more powerful than a procedural list when explaining a system interaction task; visual task models are more powerful than text descriptions; grids/tables are more powerful than text in paragraphs  Support resources are not merely collections of reference material made available to the performer, but explicitly support or enable the other PCD criteria.).  For example, support resources may appear in the interface to help the performer establish a goal or move the performer through the proper flow of work.

 

5.  Focuses on task(s), processes, and the natural flow of work.

 

The designers of FEIRS worked carefully to ensure that the logical flow of the process drove the software and not the other way around.  Working closely with inspectors both in the classroom and at inspection sites such as farmers markets, the design team built in tools to be available at the appropriate moment in order to facilitate the natural work flow.  The inspection culminates with a tamper-proof certificate, complete with a digital signature, printed at the site of the inspection using the inspector’s portable printer.

 

Uses task models and/or sequencing to facilitate best practice work performance by performers.  Performers need not have internalized the task model and sequencing in advance to successfully perform the work.  Data input, retrieval and manipulation are presented within the task context rather than as the primary focus of the system or as items that the performer is burdened with identifying or retrieving once the task context is identified.  That is, the system can not require that the task model, data transformation, and navigation sequences be in the performer's head in advance with data-entry the only real goal of the system. 

Task sequencing is more than simply navigating through various data screens.  Task language, goals, and related resources are incorporated into the work-flows.

Reflects and/or accommodates the way work naturally occurs, thus supporting other PCD criteria (e.g., presents relevant data and tools to accomplish a goal at the proper point in the workflow).  Does not merely instruct the performer of which sequence to navigate, but facilitates proper navigation.  Passively constrains the performer to a flow or process in cases of high risk, or re-directs / suggests best alternatives when risk is low.  Generates deliverables automatically (e.g. file notes, communications, purchase orders, etc.).

 

6.  Reduces or eliminates the need for training/learning.

 

The use of FEIRS produces more consistent performance between inspectors, regardless of their experience level.  In order to maintain the same level of performance, FPB would have had to invest in more frequent refresher training.

 

Even if the design basis of the solution is learning or reference, its PCD characteristics should reduce or eliminate the need for training/learning in advance of performing the supported task.  Visual representations of quantities, actions, components, and physical affects/dynamics can instantly communicate vital information that enables task completion without the need for lengthy explanations.  The use of metaphor, task sequencing, redirection, passive constraint, and embedded workflow can ensure speedy and accurate task completion without deliberation, hesitation, or extensive conceptual activity.

Reducing or eliminating training means that the flow of work/process, the information essential to getting the task done, and the specific human factors of the performer are orchestrated such that all three are optimal and overlap.  Maximum results are attained with minimal cognitive effort because proper sequencing of events is facilitated, human preferences are anticipated or accommodated, and support for decisions presents itself immediately.  The maximum amount of complexity of the task enabling tool is eliminated, leaving the performer free to synthesize business or organizational issues necessary to complete the task.  If learning is at all necessary, it occurs as a secondary consequence of performing the task.

 

7.  Supports performance FIRST, and learning only as a secondary consequence of doing.

 

Process Flow:  Using FEIRS begins with an intuitive process flow.  The system logically steps the inspector through the process, providing business rules at appropriate times, rather than break the process flow in order to look up standards and tolerances for the particular commodity.

 

Human Factors/Diversity:  Transitioning from a paper-based inspection to an electronic inspection is a significant change, especially with at least half of the field work force not familiar with computers.  In order to get the buy-in from inspectors, SRA conducted surveys, interviews, demonstrations, hands-on trials and field trials.  This process gradually familiarized the users with the new system, and changed fears and uncertainty to excitement.

 

SRA conducted comprehensive market and technology research on hardware to meet the FEIRS application requirement, and selected several different laptop PCs, tablet PCs and hand-held devices.  The project team demonstrated all selected hardware to the government users for hands-on evaluation.  The government project team and field users singled out two laptops for their features, durability and feasibility to the field application.  Field trails were used to select a final platform, the Panasonic Toughbook TM laptop computer.  The system was thoroughly tested in field conditions to ensure that the design accounted for environmental and human factors.  For example, testing was done in refrigerated storage areas to ensure that the displays would still be visible and would not fog over due to condensation and that the touch screen features continued to function. 

Inspectors were not required to deviate from their normal mode of operation to accommodate for the laptop or the software.  The system does not require an internet connection during operation and reduces the amount of material that the inspector must carry with them.   In the previous process, the inspector had to package their inspection forms and ship them to the central processing office for data entry.  Using FEIRS, inspectors only need a phone line in their office, home or hotel room where they can periodically dial-in via virtual private network to download inspection data and receive updates.  The entire process is designed to reduce the distance between the database and the point of collection.  Data entry is no longer reliant on the accuracy and judgment of the inspector or the data entry clerk.  Inspection data is collected virtually error free at the site.  Business rules ensure that data is normalized to standards that allow the data to be analyzed over time, identifying trends and expediting budgeting, billing and cash flow.   The fee for service nature of the operation means that if the workforce becomes more efficient by using FEIRS, they are able to generate more revenue per inspector.  The additional revenue helps the Fresh Products Branch reduce or eliminate the need for appropriated funds.

 

Pertinent Information/Knowledge:  Inspectors follow the intuitive design of the system in a logical process flow.  The system does not intervene, unless the inspector enters information outside the parameters of the established business rules for that step.  Reference and tutorials are available; however they do not become involved unless activated by the inspector.

 

 

The three essential elements of performance are process flow, human factors/diversity, and pertinent information/knowledge.  All three elements are considered and optimized in the interaction domain of the work if performance is truly supported.  If process steps are left to the performer to discover, then performance is not supported.  If translation or calculations that could otherwise be accommodated by the interface are left to the performer, then performance is not supported.  If the performer has to break the task context to obtain information vital to the task by clicking, navigating, or scrolling, then performance is not supported.  If the performer population is visually oriented and learns kinesthetically, then a user interface that is primarily static and textual does not support performance.

Your solution's characteristics should exhibit that process flow/workflow is reflected and supported in the solution, that the human factors of performer personas are consistently represented, and that essential data, information, and knowledge are present.  All three elements should work synergistically to ensure performance with minimal learning, cognitive burden, assistance, etc.  Any learning elements of the solution must be essentially passive, meaning that learning takes place as a secondary consequence of doing.  For example, performance-centered solutions are often inferred from visual representations of complex business rules.  The task is completed first by observing graphical representations, and over time an explicit understanding of rules is developed.

 

8.  Is innovative with respect to supporting performance.

 

FEIRS is self contained, providing high levels of integration between references, procedures and effective inspection techniques.  In the previous paper-based inspection system, the speed and efficiency of the inspection varied based on the skill and experience of the inspector.  Although to the layman, many commodities would seem to be the same (for example an apple has many of the same attributes as a pear), the standards for many of the commodities have evolved over decades and vary greatly in their approach.  Measurement increments, tolerances and the execution of the inspection can be very different between commodities that may seem very similar to the inexperienced.  This could potentially result in ambiguity and a lack of uniformity between inspections.

 

The design and development process included a business process reengineering.  Variations in interpretation and inspection techniques were analyzed by the SRA and USDA teams to determine what techniques could be standardized and built into the application and which ones needed to be eliminated.  Other, less robust applications may have required the USDA to rewrite standards, scales and tolerances that have been developed over decades.  Instead, the design team sought the “low hanging fruit” where the USDA experts could easily clarify areas of ambiguity and update the standards.  However, beyond the areas of ready agreement, the design team translated complex scales, formulas and tolerances into an automated set of business rules that vastly improved uniformity and efficiency, while virtually removing any ambiguity.

 

The end result was that the team’s innovative approach improved the performance of the inspectors such that a newly trained inspector’s performance was very similar to that of an inspector with years of experience.

 

By its forward-looking, anticipatory nature, this criterion defies concrete description.  In essence, the judges wish to be pleasantly surprised by clever design or application of performance-centered design principles in novel domains.  For instance…

It achieves profound, focused results with elegance, meaning that a great deal is accomplished by a performer who expends little effort and encounters minimal cognitive challenges as goals are established and accomplished.  (Example:  Completing a total sales transaction in one or two clicks.)

It is self-contained, with high levels of integration of all elements required for successful work performance by very experienced through very inexperienced personnel.  Appropriate constructs come to performer, regardless of competence / level of experience, without the performer having to make context- and experience-specific choices.

Changes dynamically to accommodate changes in business climate, organizational knowledge and strategy, and wisdom with a minimum of programmer intervention.  At the very least, it does not have to wait for the next release to respond to and accommodate business dynamics.

Continuously captures and incorporates task structuring, knowledge, data, tools and communications.  Represents each element in its most powerful form; e.g., highly visual, relationships are clear, language is natural.

Incorporates powerful, clever metaphors that enable many concepts, procedures, steps, and pieces of information to be assimilated and applied to the goal immediately and without confusion.  Anticipates and accommodates changing requirements of performers and business.

Surprises the performer with its richness, representation and power.  Is always self-revealing, regardless of how sophisticated the tasks it supports.  Makes life very easy for performers.

By its forward-looking, anticipatory nature, this criterion defies concrete description.  In essence, the judges wish to be pleasantly surprised by clever design or application of performance-centered design principles in novel domains.  For instance…

It achieves profound, focused results with elegance, meaning that a great deal is accomplished by a performer who expends little effort and encounters minimal cognitive challenges as goals are established and accomplished.  (Example:  Completing a total sales transaction in one or two clicks.)

It is self-contained, with high levels of integration of all elements required for successful work performance by very experienced through very inexperienced personnel.  Appropriate constructs come to performer, regardless of competence / level of experience, without the performer having to make context- and experience-specific choices.

Changes dynamically to accommodate changes in business climate, organizational knowledge and strategy, and wisdom with a minimum of programmer intervention.  At the very least, it does not have to wait for the next release to respond to and accommodate business dynamics.

Continuously captures and incorporates task structuring, knowledge, data, tools and communications.  Represents each element in its most powerful form; e.g., highly visual, relationships are clear, language is natural.

Incorporates powerful, clever metaphors that enable many concepts, procedures, steps, and pieces of information to be assimilated and applied to the goal immediately and without confusion.  Anticipates and accommodates changing requirements of performers and business.

Surprises the performer with its richness, representation and power.  Is always self-revealing, regardless of how sophisticated the tasks it supports.  Makes life very easy for performers.

 


Prior State:

(Required)

In the prior state, inspections were accomplished using paper forms and notations from the inspector.  Accuracy relied solely on the skill of the inspector and their ability to interpret references consisting of several hundred pages.

 

Processing of data required several days as the inspector’s paper based forms from the day’s inspections would have to be sent by the inspector to the central processing center where the data was entered by hand and records were updated.  From that data invoices were sent to the customers being inspected.

 

Insert a description of the processes and/or system(s) that were previously used to perform the function that your solution now supports. If a system was used to perform this function, please consider including a screen shot of it.

 


User Profile:

(Required)

USDA Inspectors can range in age from early twenties to sixties.  They are male or female and are usually college educated.  They usually have some sort of agricultural experience or education.  Experience levels as an inspector range from recent inspector school graduates to several decades of experience as an inspector.

 

This profile did not change as a result of implementing FEIRS, however the performance became more consistent across the wide range of experience across the inspector workforce.

 

Insert a profile of typical users; their skills, education level, job experience and business knowledge. Did this profile change as a result of implementing the PCD Solution?  If so, please explain how.

 


Results:

(Required)

FEIRS reduces the cycle time required to generate certificates by eliminating the shipping of paper records to a central administrative facility, where inspection data was manually entered into the system. The previous manual approach lengthened the process as well as introducing potential errors.  See figure below.

 

 

An added benefit of FEIRS is that the bulletin feature can be used to combat agro-terrorism.  A clear depiction of any threat and actions to be taken can be rapidly deployed to the entire inspector force with their next data upload.  This replaces sending faxes and making phone calls to alert inspectors to potential threats.

 

Insert a summary of any performance improvement data you may have collected. For example, this might include information about reductions in errors, training time, or the time it takes to perform specific tasks.


Other Evidence:

The FEIRS application, installation instructions, basic manual and demonstration animation were sent to EPSSCentral on 18 August 2006, via FedEx.

 

 

Describe anything else that contributes to your submission being an exceptional and/or innovative PCD Solution entry.